Sunlit Water

May 11, 2007

Content!

Filed under: Dating — by teofilo @ 4:50 pm

I’m done with my thesis and pretty much everything else, so I should have more time to blog now.  Let’s start off with this fascinating map (via the g).  The east-west divide is really striking; I’ve heard before that New York in particular has a hugely disproportionate number of single women, but I hadn’t realized that the same was the case in most other eastern cities or that the opposite was true for most of California.  The fact that all of the main cities I am looking at for jobs have very favorable ratios is encouraging.

14 Comments »

  1. Two girls for every boy, indeed.

    Comment by neil — May 11, 2007 @ 4:57 pm |Reply

  2. Hm, I would love to see this map overlaid with an age map. I suspect this is at least as much a map about youthfulness as it is about gender and marital status. The older the population, the more single women.

    Comment by Witt — May 11, 2007 @ 5:05 pm |Reply

  3. I hadn’t thought about that angle, but it makes sense. On the other hand, don’t most large cities have fairly youthful populations?

    Comment by teofilo — May 11, 2007 @ 5:15 pm |Reply

  4. It would also be cool to see different versions of the map, parsed for sexual orientation. Cool for Labs, I mean.

    Comment by Stanley — May 11, 2007 @ 7:27 pm |Reply

  5. Thinking some more about the age issue, I’m skeptical. Look at Phoenix, for instance.

    Comment by teofilo — May 11, 2007 @ 7:59 pm |Reply

  6. Well, I’d guess Austin fits pretty well. At least in my (limited) experience as a male. And yet my standards are still too high. Go figure.

    Comment by pdf23ds — May 11, 2007 @ 9:08 pm |Reply

  7. You could try San Antonio.

    Comment by teofilo — May 11, 2007 @ 9:32 pm |Reply

  8. Yeah, fat chance. When I get the balls to move to a real city, (and I really hate finding parking, you know,) I’m moving to NY. So there.

    Comment by pdf23ds — May 11, 2007 @ 9:37 pm |Reply

  9. It’s becoming more and more likely that I stay in the east. I’m not sure this map is what’s going to make the difference, though.

    Comment by eb — May 11, 2007 @ 10:10 pm |Reply

  10. 8: When you move to NY, ditch the car. You won’t need it.

    Comment by LizardBreath — May 13, 2007 @ 7:20 pm |Reply

  11. 8: When you move to Sacramento, ditch the car. You won’t need it.

    Comment by Megan — May 13, 2007 @ 11:00 pm |Reply

  12. Note that Sacramento appears to be one of the few California cities with more single women than single men.

    Comment by teofilo — May 13, 2007 @ 11:08 pm |Reply

  13. Bummer for me. You could rent my house when I finish the move to Oakland.

    Comment by Megan — May 14, 2007 @ 1:32 am |Reply

  14. Many of those single men out west are either gay or massively flaky. She says, gloomily.

    Comment by Ile — June 10, 2007 @ 4:03 am |Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress.com